(1019) 영어공부 합시다!!!!(7)
담배한모금
쪽지전송
Views : 3,206
2017-10-20 15:34
자유게시판
1273514914
|
영어 공부 열심히 합시다
10월19일짜 뉴욕 타임지 사설입니다
거침없이 읽어 주셔요
영어 는 무조건 잘하고 볼일 입니다
하루에 사설이나 컬럼 하나 읽기...영어짱 되는 지름길!!!!
The Self-Dealing Presidency of Donald Trump
If Donald Trump thinks there’s nothing wrong with exploiting the presidency for his personal profit, he should read the Constitution.
That’s the argument plaintiffs made in a Manhattan federal court on Wednesday, in the first-ever lawsuit to accuse a president of violating the emoluments clauses — once-obscure constitutional provisions that the nation’s founders adopted to prevent corruption of public officials.
One clause prohibits officials from accepting “any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever” from foreign governments unless Congress approves; another bars presidents from getting payments from federal or state governments other than their salaries.
The emoluments clauses are based on a simple, sound idea — that the nation’s security and well-being are threatened when those entrusted with acting in the public interest use their office for private gain. Until Jan. 20, there was no need to invoke them. Presidents have been generally transparent about their financial holdings, placing assets in blind trusts and releasing their tax returns.
Mr. Trump — whose global empire of hotels, real estate, golf courses and other businesses is awash in foreign money — has refused to take those steps. Instead, he has performed in a sort of ethics theater, stepping away from the day-to-day management of the Trump Organization even as he retains his ownership in it. Since the Republican-led Congress appears to have no interest in holding Mr. Trump to account, the federal courts may be the only option.
In defending Mr. Trump on Wednesday against claims by some plaintiffs that it was impossible to compete for business against the most powerful man in the world, a Justice Department lawyer played down his pull. “The president is a market participant,” said Brett Shumate, a deputy assistant attorney general. “He is not controlling access to the market.” But his participation in the market is part of the problem: Americans shouldn’t have to worry that their leader’s primary allegiance is to his own financial fortunes.
Mr. Trump gives little reason to feel reassured. In 2015, he said of Saudi Arabia: “I get along great with all of them. They buy apartments from me.” He added: “They spend $40 million, $50 million. Am I supposed to dislike them?” (On his first overseas trip after taking office, to Saudi Arabia, Mr. Trump lavished praise on the kingdom’s rulers, dismissing concerns about their repressive policies.)
Meanwhile, foreign officials are racing to curry favor with our businessman in chief. Shortly after Mr. Trump was elected, one diplomat told The Washington Post, “Why wouldn’t I stay at his hotel, blocks from the White House, so I can tell the new president, ‘I love your new hotel!’ ”
The case being heard Wednesday was filed days after Mr. Trump took office by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, or CREW, a bipartisan watchdog group. CREW’s complaint highlights the conflicts between Mr. Trump’s duties as president and his “vast, complicated and secret” web of business interests. These include Trump Tower in New York, where foreign-government-held entities like the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China hold leases that will come up for renewal during Mr. Trump’s term, and the Trump International Hotel in Washington, where foreign diplomats pay top dollar to sleep, eat and do business with the United States. (Elected federal officials, including the president, are prohibited from holding the lease to the hotel, but that’s another story.)
Since the emoluments suit was filed, plaintiffs who complained of unfair competition in the hospitality industry have joined in. Meanwhile, two separate federal suits have also charged Mr. Trump with violating the emoluments clauses — one by nearly 200 Democratic members of Congress and the other by the attorneys general of Maryland and the District of Columbia.
A central question for the courts is the meaning of “emoluments.” Does the term cover only those benefits given in exchange for an official’s “personal services,” as the White House contends? Or does it apply to “anything of value” an official receives, as the plaintiffs argue? At Wednesday’s hearing, Judge George Daniels of Federal District Court appeared sympathetic to a broader reading, but was skeptical that the plaintiffs have standing to bring the lawsuit, because they had not shown concrete ways that Mr. Trump’s actions had directly harmed them.
Even if the case is thrown out on those grounds, Mr. Trump is still a walking emoluments-clause violation. And he still refuses to release his tax returns and other financial records, preventing the public from seeing the full extent of his business entanglements, debts and interests.
In this light it’s hard to see how the American people can ever be confident that Mr. Trump, who has spent a lifetime as a money-obsessed deal maker, is acting in the nation’s best interest, and not his own.
10월19일짜 뉴욕 타임지 사설입니다
거침없이 읽어 주셔요
영어 는 무조건 잘하고 볼일 입니다
하루에 사설이나 컬럼 하나 읽기...영어짱 되는 지름길!!!!
The Self-Dealing Presidency of Donald Trump
If Donald Trump thinks there’s nothing wrong with exploiting the presidency for his personal profit, he should read the Constitution.
That’s the argument plaintiffs made in a Manhattan federal court on Wednesday, in the first-ever lawsuit to accuse a president of violating the emoluments clauses — once-obscure constitutional provisions that the nation’s founders adopted to prevent corruption of public officials.
One clause prohibits officials from accepting “any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever” from foreign governments unless Congress approves; another bars presidents from getting payments from federal or state governments other than their salaries.
The emoluments clauses are based on a simple, sound idea — that the nation’s security and well-being are threatened when those entrusted with acting in the public interest use their office for private gain. Until Jan. 20, there was no need to invoke them. Presidents have been generally transparent about their financial holdings, placing assets in blind trusts and releasing their tax returns.
Mr. Trump — whose global empire of hotels, real estate, golf courses and other businesses is awash in foreign money — has refused to take those steps. Instead, he has performed in a sort of ethics theater, stepping away from the day-to-day management of the Trump Organization even as he retains his ownership in it. Since the Republican-led Congress appears to have no interest in holding Mr. Trump to account, the federal courts may be the only option.
In defending Mr. Trump on Wednesday against claims by some plaintiffs that it was impossible to compete for business against the most powerful man in the world, a Justice Department lawyer played down his pull. “The president is a market participant,” said Brett Shumate, a deputy assistant attorney general. “He is not controlling access to the market.” But his participation in the market is part of the problem: Americans shouldn’t have to worry that their leader’s primary allegiance is to his own financial fortunes.
Mr. Trump gives little reason to feel reassured. In 2015, he said of Saudi Arabia: “I get along great with all of them. They buy apartments from me.” He added: “They spend $40 million, $50 million. Am I supposed to dislike them?” (On his first overseas trip after taking office, to Saudi Arabia, Mr. Trump lavished praise on the kingdom’s rulers, dismissing concerns about their repressive policies.)
Meanwhile, foreign officials are racing to curry favor with our businessman in chief. Shortly after Mr. Trump was elected, one diplomat told The Washington Post, “Why wouldn’t I stay at his hotel, blocks from the White House, so I can tell the new president, ‘I love your new hotel!’ ”
The case being heard Wednesday was filed days after Mr. Trump took office by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, or CREW, a bipartisan watchdog group. CREW’s complaint highlights the conflicts between Mr. Trump’s duties as president and his “vast, complicated and secret” web of business interests. These include Trump Tower in New York, where foreign-government-held entities like the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China hold leases that will come up for renewal during Mr. Trump’s term, and the Trump International Hotel in Washington, where foreign diplomats pay top dollar to sleep, eat and do business with the United States. (Elected federal officials, including the president, are prohibited from holding the lease to the hotel, but that’s another story.)
Since the emoluments suit was filed, plaintiffs who complained of unfair competition in the hospitality industry have joined in. Meanwhile, two separate federal suits have also charged Mr. Trump with violating the emoluments clauses — one by nearly 200 Democratic members of Congress and the other by the attorneys general of Maryland and the District of Columbia.
A central question for the courts is the meaning of “emoluments.” Does the term cover only those benefits given in exchange for an official’s “personal services,” as the White House contends? Or does it apply to “anything of value” an official receives, as the plaintiffs argue? At Wednesday’s hearing, Judge George Daniels of Federal District Court appeared sympathetic to a broader reading, but was skeptical that the plaintiffs have standing to bring the lawsuit, because they had not shown concrete ways that Mr. Trump’s actions had directly harmed them.
Even if the case is thrown out on those grounds, Mr. Trump is still a walking emoluments-clause violation. And he still refuses to release his tax returns and other financial records, preventing the public from seeing the full extent of his business entanglements, debts and interests.
In this light it’s hard to see how the American people can ever be confident that Mr. Trump, who has spent a lifetime as a money-obsessed deal maker, is acting in the nation’s best interest, and not his own.
질의 중... 30초 정도 걸려요 ...
@알림 : 코멘트를 작성하시려면 로그인을 하십시오.
모두모두 [쪽지 보내기]
2017-10-20 17:44
No.
1273515177
10 포인트 획득. ... 힘내세요!
흠..... 공부 해야겠네요 ㅎ
a
a
0906
aaaaaaaaa
@알림 : 코멘트를 작성하시려면 로그인을 하십시오.
모두모두 [쪽지 보내기]
2017-10-20 17:45
No.
1273515181
63 포인트 획득. 축하!
@알림 : 코멘트를 작성하시려면 로그인을 하십시오.
아카시아마닐라 [쪽지 보내기]
2017-10-20 19:46
No.
1273515395
42 포인트 획득. 축하!
굉장히 좋은 내용 이네요, 잘 읽었습니다.
담에도 부탁 드려요.
담에도 부탁 드려요.
@알림 : 코멘트를 작성하시려면 로그인을 하십시오.
DavidPark [쪽지 보내기]
2017-10-20 23:43
No.
1273515947
94 포인트 획득. 축하!
@ 아카시아마닐라 님에게...
저도요..
너무 쉬운 문장이라 곧바로 이해되네요
어려운 단어도 하나도 없구요
저도 계속 부탁드려요
저도요..
너무 쉬운 문장이라 곧바로 이해되네요
어려운 단어도 하나도 없구요
저도 계속 부탁드려요
@알림 : 코멘트를 작성하시려면 로그인을 하십시오.
우리함게 [쪽지 보내기]
2017-10-20 22:32
No.
1273515820
74 포인트 획득. 축하!
어려운 것 시키지마세요
골머리 아파여 좋용히 살으려임니다,,
골머리 아파여 좋용히 살으려임니다,,
@알림 : 코멘트를 작성하시려면 로그인을 하십시오.
DavidPark [쪽지 보내기]
2017-10-20 23:45
No.
1273515950
44 포인트 획득. 축하!
@ 우리함게 님에게..
하나도 어렵지 않아요
위 내용을 요약하면,
트럼프가 아직 대통령 하고 있단 말이에요
영어 너무 어렵게 생각하지 마세요
하나도 어렵지 않아요
위 내용을 요약하면,
트럼프가 아직 대통령 하고 있단 말이에요
영어 너무 어렵게 생각하지 마세요
@알림 : 코멘트를 작성하시려면 로그인을 하십시오.
기쁨가득한 [쪽지 보내기]
2017-10-20 23:50
No.
1273515960
46 포인트 획득. 축하!
담배님의 의지.. 대단하셔요.. 그간의 과정도 글코.. 결코 쉽지 않은걸 척척하시는거 보면 대단하십니다. 영어는 그냥 읽고 이해정도면 될듯해요. 요즘 파파고가 하도 좋아서.. 더 좋아지겠죠 앞으로는.. 전 걍 제 수준에 만족하고 창의력을 키우는 공상이나 하려 합니다. 50이지만 앞으로의 살길은 공부가 아니라 공상이라 생각하거든요. 갈길이 틀리고 생각이 틀리지만 님의 의지는 존중하고 존경합니다. 앞으로도 쭉.. 열심 하시길요.. 저도 열심 하겠습니다..♥
라스트컨설팅
인천 서구
?
하이.com
@알림 : 코멘트를 작성하시려면 로그인을 하십시오.
No. 95493
Page 1910
Reminder :
필고 인공지능 GPT-4 Turbo 업데이트 안내
( 6 )
Reminder :
필고 닉네임 업데이트 안내
( 12 )
맥날 배달시켰는데 버거안에 밥이 들어가있네요 (9)
stolane
1,241
17:20
개인장터 사기꾼 주의하세요 (2)
머뤼브릿지
1,020
16:44
필리핀 장기체류 (6)
JustinK
1,761
09:24
오버스테이는 5년까지 하셔야함. (2)
단@네이버-38
1,238
09:17
보이스피싱 총책 이대승을 찾습니다 (5)
가고파필리핀
3,076
24-04-18
한국사람들이 필리핀여성을 만날때 특히 싱글맘이 많은 이유 (27)
Justin Kang@구글-q...
6,125
24-04-18
실랑 한인부부가 운영하는 치과 아시는분 (6)
Kimkim8888
4,073
24-04-17
지캐시 수수료 15페소로 입금하는법 (6)
stolane
4,747
24-04-16
불라칸에서 마닐라 (10)
리알쾌손
6,625
24-04-16
사람만한 박쥐가 자라는 곳 ㄷㄷ (1)
hitchjang
3,163
24-04-16
G CASH 한도 올리기. (18)
Ruiz LP
10,946
24-04-15
이런거 믿을수있는건가요? 친구가 투자하려는데 아무래도 아닌것 ... (10)
Pilgyo Jeon
5,690
24-04-15
필리핀 경기 어떤가요? (5)
8eb28c
1,993
24-04-15
정킷 호객 질문좀.. (1)
단@네이버-38
1,991
24-04-15
필리핀 여대생을 뇌물로 바친 경찰들 (3)
popala
5,187
24-04-14
아래 글 답글을 막아두셔서 부득이하게
Prisia
1,827
24-04-14
This post has been locked for temporary. (6)
tkrlrns gilon
5,244
24-04-13
This post has been locked for temporary.
tkrlrns gilon
1,235
24-04-13
금 1돈에 사십만원 훨씬 넘었네요.
abscbn1
1,457
24-04-13